You’re making fun of my name, making absurd accusations, and then calling me a provocateur. The accusation of provocateur, according to John Reed, author of 10 days that Shook the World, made the Russian Revolution more protective of the intellectual, allowing for more arguments. You’re using it to turn the conversation in an anti-intellectual direction.

You seem to be calling me a part of a lynch-mob, while you ready yourself to call the police over nothing. For that reason, I am right to protect my identity. You would slander me everywhere. Having this argument could be too expensive for my taste.

https://randomposter33.word…

https://randomposter33.word…

It is Harvey Weinstein that hired ex-Mossad agents to silence the women he attacked. It is your side that’s guilty of targeted assassinations, but you would deny my side any means of defending itself.

As for lynch mobs- it is much more likely those of you accusing everyone of participation in mobs are yourselves guilty of influencing the “mob”. The more conscious you remain of an ïmaginary “mob” over-looking everything, the more you will try to influence that mob rather than participate in the real process that is at work.

I’m not admitting guilt, but hopefully this is seen as a wedge issue over time, meant deliberately to divide everyone who argues about it.

What if it’s 5 women? What if it’s 40 women, or 100? What if they have ex-Mossad operatives silencing the witnesses for them? What if they’re paying millions of dollars in hush money?

It’s too threatening on your part to accuse everyone of being a “mob” as soon as they distance themselves in some way from one or another “talent”. What should happen to the “mob” then? How should they be silenced? Why don’t you do that to the “talent”, so we don’t have to discuss their legal problems in the first place?

It’s not that easy to get rid of me. Why do you hate me so much?

Bill Van Auken encourages abstinence.

https://upload.wikimedia.or…

https://goo.gl/images/qJkCug