The NYT accepted a compromise with the revolution, in the hopes of later subverting the revolution. The weakness of the NYT, witnessed by its long-term decline, testifies to the strength of revolutionary sentiment and a growing historical consciousness in the working class. You spin the compromise by the New York Times over sexually perverted workplace security issues as strength for the bourgeoisie, but instead you should analyze it correctly as weakness and as a calculation on their side.

Their compromise should not be met, as it might instinctively, by compromise from the revolution. The revolution should exploit the cracks in capitalist rule to dominate the national conversation and bring the masses over to the perspective of socialism.