-
Krupskaya On Marxist Monogamy (First Draft)
Part 1: Direct Quotes from Krupskaya From her memoirs and writings, particularly Reminiscences of Lenin (1926) and her public addresses on women and education, Krupskaya offered pointed commentary that indirectly and sometimes directly criticized both Lenin and Inessa Armand. Key quotations include: On the unity of male and female workers and critique of factional oversight (against both Lenin and Armand’s emphasis on party hierarchy for women’s issues): On integrating personal life with revolutionary commitment (implicit critique of Lenin’s rigid political focus and Armand’s particularist methods in women’s emancipation): On educational reform and egalitarian principles as a critique of party elitism: These quotes unveil Krupskaya’s emphasis on solidarity, integration of personal and political spheres, and accessibility of revolutionary benefits to all, marking a subtle critique of Lenin’s sometimes centralized, top-down strategies and Armand’s focus on elite women activists. Part 2: Interpretation on Marxist Monogamist Strategy Krupskaya’s observations could have influenced the strategy of the “Marxist monogamist” in several interrelated ways: Promotion of equality in organizing revolutions: Her insistence on male–female worker solidarity reinforced a strategy where revolutionary efforts could not ignore half of the proletariat. A Marxist committed to intimate loyalty (monogamist in personal life) could internalize this as prioritizing equitable inclusion of all comrades, both in political and domestic spheres. Linking personal and political life: By urging revolutionary actors to connect their personal commitments with broader social aims, Krupskaya suggested that a monogamist’s personal discipline and fidelity could serve as a microcosm of political consistency. The ethical rigor of personal life would reinforce political strategy. Institution-building through egalitarian principles: Her insistence that schools be accessible to all implies that revolutionary strategy should emphasize structural reform, not just symbolic victories. For the monogamist revolutionary, this reflects the idea that ideological consistency in private life coincides with sustained, equitable social engineering. Subtle checks on centralization and elitism: Her critiques urged attention to the grassroots level, pushing the monogamist revolutionary to avoid over-concentration of authority and instead rely on transparent, participatory channels, whether in revolutionary committees or in domestic partnerships that double as ideological laboratories. Conclusion Through direct quotations, Krupskaya critiqued aspects of Lenin’s centralizing tendenciesand Armand’s selective emphasis on women activists, advocating instead for solidarity, inclusiveness, and integration of personal and political life. For a Marxist revolutionary aligned with monogamist discipline, these principles would have translated into a strategy that emphasizes egalitarian participation, moral consistency in personal relationships, and practical work towards universal access to revolutionary benefits, rather than privileging elite groups or personal ambition. References Key Quotes from Krupskaya: “That which unites working women with working men is stronger than that which divides them…” “We should try to link our personal lives with the cause for which we struggle, with the cause of building communism.” “In serving the interests of the masses, the government … must break the schools’ class character … not in words but in deeds.” Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Trotsky Delays Fourth International Through Micro-management of Individuals in the Left Opposition
(https://sl.bing.net/hOUzu98PYui) A theory for a Kollontai-backed pressure campaign forcing Trotsky to the table makes sense if you breakdown the timeline of his submission to Fourth International organizational structure. date Trotsky founded 4th international and dates of norway imprisonment 📅 Trotsky’s Founding of the Fourth International Leon Trotsky officially founded the… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Political Assasination and Criminalization of Marxist Leaders: Dan Reznick’s Revolutionary Marxism, Alex Lantier’s Legalist Stalinism, and Historical Background
Here is a rigorous, historically grounded summary of your position—framed within revolutionary Marxist theory and public discourse boundaries. It does not advocate assassination, but acknowledges its historical use by revolutionary and progressive commissions under conditions of extreme repression. Summary: Revolutionary Defense, Betrayal, and the Suppression of Marxist Military Science Frunze’s… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Kollontai Fights Back
Trotsky “floated like a cork in the ocean,” landing in Norway where Kollontai’s advanced planning punished him for his gas war tactics against the Tenth Congress. His gas war general, Mikhail Tukhachevsky, served in the Tsar’s army, fell prisoner to the German army, imprisoned for two years and seven months,… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Kollontai in Mexico and Norway – Where She Laid Her Traps to Imprison and K*ll Trotsky
Overlap in Norway and Mexico: Both Kollontai and Trotsky were stationed in Norway and Mexico—though under vastly different circumstances. Kollontai was a state envoy; Trotsky was a stateless exile. Her diplomatic postings in Norway (1923–25, 1927–30) and Mexico (1926–27) occurred before Trotsky’s arrival in either country. He was exiled to… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Kollontai, the 10th Congress, and the Famous Kronstad-Petrograd Rebellion of 1921 (Part of the Forced Famines, the Tambov Rebellion, and Trotsky’s Aristocratic and German Prisoner Turned General Tukhachevsky’s Gas War to Suppress Democracy)
did anyone stress the dramatic moment when Trotsky pushed her or blocked or interrupted her on stage? did he lead the fight against her and the Workers opposition? 🎭 Did Trotsky Ever Publicly Confront Her? There’s no documented moment where Trotsky physically pushed, blocked, or interrupted Kollontai on stage. However:… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Here’s a curated list of primary sources and archival materials related to the Kronstadt Rebellion, the Petropavlovsk Resolutions, and the Izvestia of the Provisional Revolutionary Committee, along with original texts from Kronstadt and Petrograd strike leaders. These are essential for reconstructing the ideological and tactical resistance to Bolshevik repression in… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Avoidance of Pankhurst by Shachtman and Cliff
Max Shachtman and Tony Cliff both developed influential theories of Soviet society — bureaucratic collectivism and state capitalism, respectively — but neither engaged Sylvia Pankhurst’s work, despite its direct relevance. Their avoidance wasn’t just accidental; it reflected deeper ideological, factional, and gendered dynamics within Marxist historiography. 🧠 Max Shachtman: Bureaucratic Collectivism and Strategic… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+
-
Tweets, Replies, and Chats from Randomposter33 – 2020-2025
Let us reply to the carefully crafted swamp of the Mamdani camp with our historical, political record. It shows that our revolutionary opposition to capitalism far outdates his spontaneous and limited socialist reform campaign. Participation with volunteers “in real life” must begin with an understanding that the class conflict does… Click here to continue reading…
+
+
+Colombo Action Committee and SEP-Left Publishes Open Letter. Also:
Click here to see the new statements of the Colombo Action Committee of Sri Lanka and the SEP-Left.
ICFI (1953) Supporters (We recommend an occasional visit.) Exposes Nanobureaucratic Mafia:
Click here to see ICFI Supporters’ Exposure of Nanobureaucy’s Corporate-Mafia Outfit Connections
+
+
+


You must be logged in to post a comment.