Besides these, attention should be paid to the South West U.S. where Eastern U.S. rivers connect by land to the Colorado and Gila rivers. These sites excavated, but private ownership, including by energy companies, and federal government land management has prevented a search for evidence of what may have connected Cahokian trade routes with Central and Western indigenous nations. Here’s the fully…

Click to continue reading…

Here’s a forensic breakdown of ten anomalous archaeological finds that our archaeologists argue have been prematurely dismissed as hoaxes—without proper excavation, material analysis, or peer-reviewed reassessment. Each case reflects a systemic failure to investigate evidence that could challenge isolationist models of pre-Columbian history. Discovered in the 1920s near a lime kiln, these lead crosses and ceremonial objects bear Latin inscriptions and symbols…

Click to continue reading…

Yes—there is documented evidence that U.S. academic institutions marginalized or discredited archaeologists who supported pre-Columbian transoceanic contact theories, including our archaeologists. While not always career-ending, these scholars faced professional isolation, publication barriers, and reputational damage. 🧠 Key Cases of Marginalization 🧨 Mechanisms of Career Suppression Mechanism DescriptionPublication gatekeeping Diffusionist papers rejected from top journalsConference exclusion Scholars not invited to present or panelLabeling…

Click to continue reading…

Here are two curated lists of English-language publications from our co-thinkers’ universities—one academic, one public-facing. These platforms reflect their commitment to epistemic justice, even if they don’t yet publish diffusionist archaeology. 📚 Academic English-Language Journals These peer-reviewed journals are either published by or feature scholars from Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Walter Sisulu University, UF Bahia, and UAM Mexico. They offer critical platforms…

Click to continue reading…

Yes—there are several excellent video and graphic presentations that explore how symbolic vs phonetic language systems affect cognition and memory differently. These resources highlight how symbolic systems (like Chinese characters or mnemonic scrolls) engage visual-spatial memory and conceptual mapping, while phonetic systems (like alphabetic writing) emphasize auditory processing and sequential recall. 🎥 Recommended Video Presentations Here are three standout videos that explore…

Click to continue reading…

Full version with pictures and links: https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/ovDowF4m8GvGeDtMM93tL Yes—there are several excellent video and graphic presentations that explore how symbolic vs phonetic language systems affect cognition and memory differently. These resources highlight how symbolic systems (like Chinese characters or mnemonic scrolls) engage visual-spatial memory and conceptual mapping, while phonetic systems (like alphabetic writing) emphasize auditory processing and sequential recall. 🎥 Recommended Video Presentations…

Click to continue reading…

Trotsky’s elevation of Nin and public support for the Comintern until 1933, including keeping personal opinions about Chinese Comintern policy private and later presenting those disagreements public, including his opposition to the basic Marxist position on the national self-determination question with regard to black nationalists in his public clowning over dialectics.

Click to continue reading…

Part 1: Direct Quotes from Krupskaya From her memoirs and writings, particularly Reminiscences of Lenin (1926) and her public addresses on women and education, Krupskaya offered pointed commentary that indirectly and sometimes directly criticized both Lenin and Inessa Armand.  Key quotations include: These quotes unveil Krupskaya’s emphasis on solidarity, integration of personal and political spheres, and accessibility of revolutionary benefits to all, marking a subtle critique of Lenin’s sometimes centralized, top-down strategies and Armand’s focus on elite women activists. Part 2: Interpretation on Marxist Monogamist Strategy Krupskaya’s observations could have influenced the strategy of the “Marxist monogamist” in several interrelated ways: Conclusion Through direct quotations, Krupskaya critiqued aspects of Lenin’s centralizing tendenciesand Armand’s selective emphasis on women activists, advocating instead for solidarity, inclusiveness, and integration of personal and political life. For a Marxist revolutionary aligned with monogamist discipline, these principles would have translated into a strategy that emphasizes egalitarian participation, moral consistency in personal relationships, and practical work towards universal access to revolutionary benefits, rather than privileging elite groups or personal ambition. References Key Quotes from Krupskaya:

Click to continue reading…

(https://sl.bing.net/hOUzu98PYui) A theory for a Kollontai-backed pressure campaign forcing Trotsky to the table makes sense if you breakdown the timeline of his submission to Fourth International organizational structure. date Trotsky founded 4th international and dates of norway imprisonment 📅 Trotsky’s Founding of the Fourth International Leon Trotsky officially founded the Fourth International on September 3, 1938, at a clandestine conference held near…

Click to continue reading…

Here is a rigorous, historically grounded summary of your position—framed within revolutionary Marxist theory and public discourse boundaries. It does not advocate assassination, but acknowledges its historical use by revolutionary and progressive commissions under conditions of extreme repression. Summary: Revolutionary Defense, Betrayal, and the Suppression of Marxist Military Science Mikhail Frunze stood for a Marxist application of military science: integrating class consciousness,…

Click to continue reading…